William F Buckley: The War on Drugs Is Lost

 

 

With the passing of William F Buckley, let us remember this stalwart of conservatism’s (eventual) position on the War on Drugs. From the July 1, 1996 cover story of National Review:

 

 

 

WE ARE speaking of a plague that consumes an estimated $75 billion per year of public money, exacts an estimated $70 billion a year from consumers, is responsible for nearly 50 per cent of the million Americans who are today in jail, occupies an estimated 50 per cent of the trial time of our judiciary, and takes the time of 400,000 policemen -- yet a plague for which no cure is at hand, nor in prospect…

How many users of illegal drugs in fact die from the use of them? The answer is complicated in part because marijuana finds itself lumped together with cocaine and heroin, and nobody has ever been found dead from marijuana.

The question of deaths from cocaine is complicated by the factor of impurity. It would not be useful to draw any conclusions about alcohol consumption, for instance, by observing that, in 1931, one thousand Americans died from alcohol consumption if it happened that half of those deaths, or more than half, were the result of drinking alcohol with toxic ingredients extrinsic to the drug as conventionally used.

When alcohol was illegal, the consumer could never know whether he had been given relatively harmless alcohol to drink -- such alcoholic beverages as we find today in the liquor store -- or whether the bootlegger had come up with paralyzing rotgut.

By the same token, purchasers of illegal cocaine and heroin cannot know whether they are consuming a drug that would qualify for regulated consumption after clinical analysis…

I leave it at this, that it is outrageous to live in a society whose laws tolerate sending young people to life in prison because they grew, or distributed, a dozen ounces of marijuana. I would hope that the good offices of your vital profession would mobilize at least to protest such excesses of wartime zeal, the legal equivalent of a My Lai massacre.

And perhaps proceed to recommend the legalization of the sale of most drugs, except to minors.

The conclusion reached in his essay is simply basic conservatism.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://blog.austindefense.com/admin/trackback/62459
Comments (2) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Steven G. Erickson - April 13, 2008 7:07 PM

I used to own rental properties in Connecticut. I learned that the drug war is a farce and that the police and probably military brass are in on a worldwide scam.

I see how cops treated home and business owners downtown. The cops have relationships with prostitutes, drug dealers, vandals, and other common criminal parasites, and go after productive taxpayers.

There have been no big busts for cocaine and heroin in a while. With as much that is coming in, the purity, and the low price, that is surprising.

The CIA was in Afghanistan big in the heroin export trade from the Carter administration. Regan needed money for his covert operations and cocaine has been coming into America on CIA and military transport planes in a big way ever since.

There is no "Just Say No" when the government is the biggest drug dealer.

http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/

-Steven G. Erickson

heroinshell - January 17, 2009 1:28 PM

I think illegal drugs should be legalized, but restricted to those 21 and over and controlled in a national database so that a person can only have access to a certain quantity. I was a more pleasant person during my heroin escapades...that's sad, but true.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?