Come Senators, Congressman, Please Heed The Call

The political landscape is shifting. Perhaps slowly, but the numbers don’t lie.

The first elected official who ever made the case to me for legalizing gay marriage — and maybe the last, come to think of it — was Jesse Ventura, the former governor of Minnesota…

His libertarian philosophy extended to social issues, on which Ventura, who counted gay men among his closest aides and friends, said government had no business intruding.

As the governor told me then, he didn’t care what the gay couple next door were doing in the privacy of their home, including hanging up a marriage certificate, just as he didn’t think anyone should pester him about keeping a gun in his nightstand.

From last week’s NYT Magazine article “Queer Developments”, by Matt Bai. Same source, the percentage of respondents, by age, who agree that not allowing same-sex couples to marry is discrimination, by age:

18-34 year olds     60%
35-54 year olds     45%
55 and older           38%

To explain the statistically significant difference in results by age, Bai hypothesizes:

The gist of the disagreement now isn’t partisan or theological as much as it is generational.

Unlike their parents, younger Americans and those now transitioning into middle age have had openly gay friends and colleagues all their lives, and they understand homosexuality to be a form of biological happenstance rather than of emotional disturbance.

They’re less inclined to restrict the personal decisions of gay Americans.

On the second paragraph, I agree and disagree. First the agreement: people who know and interact daily with openly gay co-workers, neighbors, roommates, friends, and, not in the least, family members soon discover the truth: a person’s sexual orientation is irrelevant. To anything and everything, unless perhaps you want to date them and are yourself of the opposite sex persuasion.

They can be your best friends or be jerks, brilliant or dim, trustworthy or dishonest… in other words, “they” as a group are… just like everyone else. They are human. Their sexuality is irrelevant. (I’m assuming in part you don’t spend any time considering your straight friends’ sex lives. If you’re a pervert, or some sort of deviant unable to stop fixating on what everyone you come into contact with does in the bedroom, you may as well stop reading this post.)

Back to Bai’s point: humans fear the unknown. When gays were forced by society into the closet, some people never realized they worked and lived along side homosexuals. Folks were then able to convince themselves, incorrectly, that everyone they knew was straight. This situation kicked in the “us vs. them” gene, and allowed them to assume that gay people were “others”. “They” were different, and therefore to be feared and condemned, ridiculed and scapegoated.

So Bai is correct that, in part, the shifting opinion polls and differences in attitudes between young and old are in great part due to one simple fact: the younger you are, the more likely you are to “know gay people”.

As far as the second part of his statement, his biological happenstance/emotional disturbance dichotomy isn’t completely off base either. Certainly the gay-friendly among us don’t believe that being born homosexual is some sort of psychological problem. (While psychiatrists are still feeling political and social pressure when it comes to the upcoming 2012 edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, I believe homosexuality has been removed from that mix.)

But I propose that the real answer lies in part I: Gen Y, for all its faults, more than previous generations, doesn’t even consider why gays are gay, they just don’t care. It doesn’t matter. End of story.

And to politicians wishing to stir up the basest of human emotions, willing to pit one fine American against another, for the sake of playing to an ever shrinking base – a base that is literally dying off? Bob Dylan said it first: the times they are a-changin.

Do Ask, Do Tell

From It’s A Complete Outrage:

Lieutenant Daniel Choi, a founding member of Knights Out, an organization of out lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) West Point Alumni, received a letter from the Department of the Army on April 23, discharging him from the Army due to his sexual orientation…


It frankly boggles the mind that as the United States is in the midst of fighting two wars, highly qualified individuals are being booted from the military. Dan Choi is both a combat veteran and an Arab linguist – exactly the type of soldier we need in the Army.

I hope you’ll join me today in calling the White House switchboard at 202-456-1111 and urging President Obama not to fire Lt. Dan Choi; and to keep his promise to end “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”.

For those of you not keeping up with the story, here’s Lieutenant Dan Choi on Rachel Maddow, upholding the military's Honor Code.

From Choi’s open letter to President Obama and every member of Congress:

…As an infantry officer, an Iraq combat veteran and a West Point graduate with a degree in Arabic, I refuse to lie to my commanders. I refuse to lie to my peers. I refuse to lie to my subordinates. I demand honesty and courage from my soldiers. They should demand the same from me…

The Department of the Army sent a letter discharging me on April 23rd. I will not lie to you; the letter is a slap in the face. It is a slap in the face to me. It is a slap in the face to my soldiers, peers and leaders who have demonstrated that an infantry unit can be professional enough to accept diversity, to accept capable leaders, to accept skilled soldiers.

My subordinates know I’m gay. They don’t care. They are professional…

As an infantry officer, I am not accustomed to begging. But I beg you today: Do not fire me. Do not fire me because my soldiers are more than a unit or a fighting force – we are a family and we support each other. We should not learn that honesty and courage leads to punishment and insult. Their professionalism should not be rewarded with losing their leader. I understand if you must fire me, but please do not discredit and insult my soldiers for their professionalism.

When I was commissioned I was told that I serve at the pleasure of the President. I hope I have not displeased anyone by my honesty. I love my job. I want to deploy and continue to serve with the unit I respect and admire. I want to continue to serve our country because of everything it stands for.

Please do not wait to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Please do not fire me.

Very Respectfully,
Daniel W. Choi
1LT, IN
New York Army National Guard
 

Protect Marriage, Protect Children, Prohibit Divorce

Success begets success, and indeed the joyous outcome of California’s Prop 8 a week ago has inspired a “A Petition for a California State Proposition that Prohibits Divorce Between Heterosexual Married Couples”:

Divorce destroys the sanctity of marriage and its powerful influence on the betterment of society. 

 

This proposition would keep the very meaning of marriage from being transformed into nothing more than a contractual relationship between two adults.  Prohibiting divorce between heterosexual married couples will keep the interests of children and families intact.  We will continue to celebrate marriage as the union of husband and wife, not as a relationship between "Party A" and "Party B." 

 

The marriage of a man and a woman has been at the heart of society since the beginning of time and it promotes the ideal opportunity for children to be raised by a mother and a father in a family held together by the legal, communal, and spiritual bonds of marriage.  As a society we should put the best interests of children first, and those interests lie in traditional marriage. 

 

Permitting divorce destroys marriage as we know it and causes a profound harm to society.  We should be restoring marriage, not undermining it.

And for those of you who voted yes on Prop 8 but disagree with this petition...Why?  This petition is copied and pasted from literature from your website, ProtectMarriage.com, but applied to Divorce instead of Gay Marriage.  So how can you argue with your own words?

 

Brilliant. [Hat Tip: Dax Garvin]

Tags: ,

It's Sunday Morning and My Marriage Just Got Stronger

Sure, my wife and 2 children have been out of town since Friday afternoon, and I have spent the weekend alone, so how could this have happened you ask?

It’s simple. Yesterday was Saturday, and tens of thousands of straight people got married all over the nation. Probably hundreds of thousands all over the world. You see this makes my marriage stronger.

 

But Jamie – you gasp – this always happens on Saturdays, doesn’t your marriage get better every week?

 

Yes of course it does, but yesterday was extra special because Proposition 8 passed in California, and therefore the natural strengthening of my marital bond by the unions of men and women I will never meet was not placed in mortal danger by the harmful effects of two men or two women marrying each other.

 

Others have addressed this important issue better than I could in the past. Take for example Chad Fifer’s reexamination a few years ago of his critique of the Bush administration’s War in Iraq. He came to realize that there were more important issues at hand:

 

For once, I'm in complete agreement with the Bush administration — marriage between a man and a woman must be protected at all costs. I know, I know — those of you who've read my previous critiques of George W. Bush are probably surprised by my stance on this issue.

 

You were probably expecting me to go on and on about the hundreds of young men and women who continue to get killed in Iraq because of Bush's shady dealings and shitty diplomacy. But I'm sorry — when Rosie O'Donnell gets married TO ANOTHER WOMAN, all of those dead kids have to take a back seat.

 

Well said. I wish all of you – well, most of you, and I know you “others” know who I’m talking about – the best in celebrating this Family Values moment.

Tags: ,

On Being Anti Anti-Gay

Make no mistake: I’m not asking for kudos on this subject. I’ve long since passed the age of ‘grown man’ and probably should have been more vocal about it in the past. And I’ve too often let it go. But I’ve taken recently to openly confronting friends and casual acquaintances when they express themselves in ways that are ‘anti-gay’.

Just for context, we’re not talking about ignoring open hostility towards homosexuals, or expressing disgust at morons who use slurs and ugly epithets hoping that the listener expresses tacit or silent approval. You don’t see - or should I say ‘hear’ – that often, at least in Austin.

Austin is the only Austin in Texas. We are weird, for Texas – and that includes being less anti-gay than the rest of Texas.

A quick example.

Went to lunch with a couple folks awhile back, criminal defense lawyers, and somehow the subject of Gay Marriage came up – don’t remember how. Two distinct attitudes popped up:

  • Hate the sin, love the sinner (but I’m not a bigot)
  • ‘Gay Marriage’ isn’t about rights for gays, it’s about ‘legitimizing’ the gay lifestyle

I purposely started inserting the phrase ‘anti-gay’ into my responses to describe their views. Quick sidetrack: the purpose of phrasing it that way was (a) deliberately confrontational and (b) meant to make them feel uncomfortable. It worked.

‘Hate the Sin’ started insisting that he was not anti-gay. In fact, as a good Christian, he had formerly lived with gays, had friends that were gay, blah blah blah. He then went on to give me an analogy that would help me understand how not anti-gay he was:

  • I’m against theft… but I defend thieves
  • I’m against crack… but I take POCS cases

Exactly! You aren’t pro-theft, but you think everyone deserves a defense. You also think imprisoning drug addicts at taxpayers’ expense is stupid, and you defend possession of controlled substance charges, but you wouldn’t recommend smoking crack to your friends or family. That makes you…

  • Anti-Theft and
  • Anti-Crack

Uh, so am I.

But Mr. “Hate the Sin” - if that’s your analogy for this conversation, then accept that you are anti-gay. Perhaps the description makes you uncomfortable, but you proved why it is dead on accurate. Some people are anti-theft and anti-crack. You are anti-theft, anti-crack and anti-gay. Your analogy makes no sense otherwise.

Actually got a little worked up writing that. I’ll have to post later on Mr. ‘Gay Rights is just a Cover for Legitimizing Homosexuality’.

Tags: ,