Government Admits Marijuana Use Does Not Cause Violence

So someone googled “marijuana is associated with other crimes” and this blog came up on the eighth page of the results. I’m tempted to say the searcher had a hard time finding good solid scientific support for his thesis, if Google couldn’t legitimize the theory in the first few pages.

Anyway, I clicked the search button to see what links came up first. Lo and behold, it’s from the Department of Justice’s website, a paper written by the National Drug Intelligence Center called the Connecticut Drug Threat Assessment from July of 2002.

It’s full of the regular propaganda we have come to know, as well as the other usual suspects: faulty logic, scare tactics and inconsistency. The paper is broken down into sections about Abuse, Availability, Violence, Production, Transportation and Distribution.

Here’s what caught my eye. Check out the entire section on ‘Violence’:

Although marijuana abusers generally do not commit violent crimes, the distribution of marijuana occasionally is associated with violent crime in Connecticut.

Most violent crime associated with marijuana distribution in the state occurs between rival criminal groups and gangs.

Some marijuana distributors commit violent crimes to protect or expand their markets.

Law enforcement officials arrested two males in Connecticut in 1998 for killing a female Jamaican flight attendant and stealing 29 pounds of marijuana that she had stored in her home.

So, let’s see… DOJ admits marijuana use does not even correlate well with violence, and certainly doesn’t cause it, but that the criminalization of marijuana does. Absolutely 100% correct.

I assume the writer felt compelled to throw in that last sentence as a scare tactic, but doesn’t the whole thing, including the ‘example’ actually reinforce the obvious conclusion that marijuana use should be legal? 

NIDA and Wikipedia: the definition of propaganda

Propaganda: information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause.

Propaganda: false or partly false information used by a government or political party intended to sway the opinions of the population.

Ryan Grim at Politico reports that the National Institute on Drug Abuse was caught vandalizing its own Wikipedia entry. And, of course, we the taxpayers are paying them to do it.

Pete Guither follows up at Drug WarRant with an excellent set of links detailing the original entry, and the Government’s changes to it. NIDA’s first attempt to makeover its Wikipedia entry reads like something written by an amateur PR firm:

NIDA is not only seizing upon unprecedented opportunities and technologies to further the understanding of how drugs of abuse affect the brain and behavior, but also working to ensure the rapid and effective transfer of scientific data to policy makers, drug abuse practitioners, other health care practitioners, and the general public.

The NIDA web site is an important part of this effort.

This truly laughable attempt to recreate its entry was soon caught both by Wikipedia’s bots, and by the human editors. Apparently, the vandals at NIDA didn’t know that all entries are saved on Wikipedia, from minor changes to complete wipeouts.

That didn’t stop them from making slower but still blatant attempts to add their propaganda to the entry over the coming months. They have since admitted that they did it, and the current entry on Wikipedia contains a new section about how the government agency tried to remake its image on the site. Serves them right – and unlike their “modifications”, at least that section is 100% true.

Other bloggers reporting on and picking up this story include Steve, John Daly, Wonkette (who calls it the “War on Wikipedia”), Scott Morgan, Jacob Sullum, LeisureGuy, Magellan, Carrie Cann, Mia Culpa, and several others

This is an important story…other folks need to pick this up and run with it as well. The “War on Drugs” is indeed the “War on Truth”.