And All The Stonies Were Dancing To The Radio

My wife and I were watching the news last week when this tidbit came to our attention:

As Indiana Democratic leaders scramble to replace Evan Bayh in the US Senate race, one name is emerging from left field: rock musician John Mellencamp.

I told my wife that any man that once wrote the lyrics, “I need a lover who won’t drive me crazy/some girl to thrill me, and then go away,” could not be elected to the U.S. Senate.

She responded with three words: Bedtime For Bonzo. Point well taken.

So I did what any respectable middle aged man would do; I got on iTunes and purchased a load of John Cougar songs. Which then prompted me to indulge in an off topic nostalgic post, when I swear I initially meant to write this off topic one instead.

 

By the Time Sanjay Gupta Was My Age...

...he was being considered for Surgeon General. (With my hearty apologies to the better line: “By the time Mozart was my age… he was dead.”)

 

Right wing nut jobs (see the above link) are going ballistic over the travesty of appointing a neurosurgeon with a healthy background in communicating with the public to a position whose duties require him to be “America's chief health educator by providing Americans the best scientific information available on how to improve their health and reduce the risk of illness and injury”.

Funny that they didn’t object when the Republican Propaganda Network’s Fox News Network’s Tony Snow was named White House Press Secretary. But enough making fun of the wackos; it’s like shooting fish in the proverbial barrel. 

 

My compatriots at NORML and other marijuana decriminalization supporters may be discouraged to know that Gupta is already on record saying the usual idiotic things about the current state of our marijuana laws

 

Actually, it’s worse than the typical stuff. He freely admits that the science shows marijuana can be good medicine for Alzeheimer’s, cancer, glaucoma and MS patients to name a few… but still wants to allow states to throw people in jail for simple possession. In fact, he’s seemingly all for it.

 

<Sigh> 

 

Well, maybe that’s appropriate for the Surgeon General. After all, it’s a job you can get fired from immediately… if you dare to tell the truth.

 

[Update: I forgot to include one of my first posts ever... the DEA vs. the American Medical Association on the benefits of medical marijuana.]

On Writing Well

A few months ago, before the election, a judge and I were talking about the presidential candidates (a discussion made easier by our complete and total agreement on our preference) and I asked her whether she had read Obama’s memoir “Dreams From My Father”. She hadn’t.

Oh you must, I insisted. The only downside is realizing that when someone can express themselves and turn a phrase as well as he does, my own dreams of becoming a published author, perhaps of the next Great American Novel, start looking, well, like pipe dreams. It’s all for the best, I said. I can write my book when I get done reading all the good ones I haven’t gotten around to yet.

 

She then recommended Barbara Kingsolver’s collection of essays “Small Wonder”, and it’s taken me this long to get around to it. Just started it in fact, but something in her dedication struck me.

 

The book was published in 2002 and some of the 23 essays are a semi-direct response to September 11th. She ends the foreword with these words:

 

I dedicate this book to every citizen of my country who has suffered bereavement with honor, trepidation without panic, and the insult of fundamentalist condemnation without succumbing to similar thinking. We may yet show the world we are worth our salt.

 

Well written indeed, and better expressed than I could have. Downright prescient six years later. And the best Bush can come up with? Some other dude did it.

 

[Update: Well, no update update, that is...  As I waited 3 weeks to write my next post, I thought to myself, writing semi-often is also a component of writing well.  Use it or lose it...]

Obama to Use Political Capital to Fight the Prison Industrial Complex?

I doubt it, but here’s my transcript from the 7:40 mark of an interview of New Jersey mayor Cory Booker by Rachel Maddow. When asked by Maddow if Obama would be best served by fighting for liberal issues early in his first term, Booker replied:

Look I was told that about one of the biggest problems in America right now, that is we are wasting blood and treasure in the prison industrial complex.

 

Love the use of “blood and treasure”. First, decriminalization and/or massive reductions in penalties for drug offenders will come when politicians explain how much it’s costing their constituents to lock up non violent addicts for decades.

 

Second, the War on Drug Users is indeed a War that costs not only tons of money, but costs us in blood. That’s true both in terms of ridiculous SWAT type raids where innocent civilians and police officers are killed by each other, and frankly in terms of sentencing non violent defendants to years or decades or lifetimes in prison.

 

Third, it’s just a nice use of the phrase that we hear bandied about in discussions about the Iraq War. But to continue with Mayor Booker’s point:

 

And people told me this was a ‘left’ issue. You can’t talk about reducing the amount of prisons or helping guys when they come back.

 

I’m now a mayor in a majority African-American city that has the Manhattan Institute partnering with me on ex offender re-entry because I didn’t sell it as an ideological issue – I sold it as an American issue: that we are wasting billions of dollars in the State of New Jersey warehousing people, where if we do simple basic things to empower their lives, not only do we lessen our prison population, the cost of that, but we create taxpayers…

 

Warehousing people indeed. And, to mesh his points together, it’s awfully expensive – never mind possibly immoral – to “warehouse” people who haven’t done any harm except sometimes unto themselves.

 

I don’t really have much actual hope that our president-elect will choose to spend much of his newly acquired political capital on these issues, but it’s nice to hear the possibility of it at least raised in sensible conversations.

 

Here’s the video clip:

 

 

Here Comes the Sun

Little darling, it's been a long cold lonely winter
Little darling, it feels like years since it's been here

Here comes the sun, here comes the sun
and I say it's all right

The First Amendment According to Sarah Palin

"If [the media] convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations, then I don't know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media."

Click Chris Plante Interviews Sarah Palin Part 2 to hear the quote – and to confirm that Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin is indeed explaining her fears that the media may chill future government candidate’s speech.

 

This story is all over the blogospherewith all the responses you would expect from such a silly statement. “Silly” is being kind – but I don’t care to regurgitate on the same topic as others; instead I thought I’d figure out just exactly what First Amendment Palin had been reading.

Perhaps this is it:

 

The Press shall make no comment criticizing a Republican Candidate, or ask any substantive questions of said Candidate; or endorsing the Candidate’s opponent; or print letters to the Editor in support of the opposition; or aid the people in their right to understand the issues.

 

I welcome any improvements in the comments section…

Please Vote

Tomorrow. It’s important. 

The polls are open 7 am to 7 p.m. Here’s a link to find your polling place in Travis County.

More Scare Tactics: "Obama Loves Criminals"

In the regular course of relentlessly blogging sentencing law and policy issues Doug Berman has frequently wondered over the course of this presidential campaign why criminal justice issues haven’t been raised more often. I’ve mad no bones about which candidate I have supported during this election cycle, despite this not being a political blog and while I’d love to se a real discussion of the issues, I have little doubt that the most we could ever expect to see would be ads attacking Obama as soft on crime. (Perhaps one could ask if any type of criminal justice blog could be non political, but let’s skip that for now.)

Then a few weeks ago Berman asked “Is Senator McCain preparing to attack Senator Obama on crime issues?”:

 

Over at The Atlantic, Marc Ambinder has this notable new post suggesting that old-school "soft-on-crime" attacks are part of Senator McCain's strategy to get back his mojo in the final month of the 2008 campaign.

 

As regular readers know, I have been itching for crime and punishment to be a campaign issue for quite some time.  I am not especially surprised that the campaign of Senator McCain would return to classic line of attack on Democrats; indeed, I am surprised that this issue has not come up sooner.

 

Alas, while the issue has finally come up in this flier mailed to Florida residents recently, you can see that the Republican Party is not even attempting to discuss criminal justice issues seriously:

 

 

Really, could you have a less substantive attack than this one?

Recount: An Open Wound

Watched HBO’s Recount last night with my wife and sister-in-law, and thought about blogging on it.

Basically, it’s too painful to write about. Of course, there was no realistic recourse for the parts like 20,000 non-felons purged from the voting rolls – oh, who just so happened to be likely big D Democratic voters.

Several times we just groaned. Paused the DVR and talked about what should have been done. Started watching again.

It’s good, don’t get me wrong. But yes, it’s salt on an open wound.

Crimson Flames Tied Through My Ears

My rough transcription – but possibly accurate, I rewound several times - from Obama’s Tuesday night victory speech:

[McCain’s] plan to win in November appears to come from the very same playbook that his side has used time after time and election after election.

Yes, we know what’s coming. I’m not naive. We’ve already seen it.

The same names and labels they always pin on everyone who doesn’t agree with their ideas. The same efforts to distract us from the issues that effect our lives by pouncing on every gaffe and association and fake controversy in the hopes that the media will play along.

The attempts to play on our fears and exploit our differences, to turn us against each other for political gain, to slice and dice this country into red states and blue states, blue collar and white collar, white, black, brown, young, old, rich, poor…

This is the race we expect… The question then is not what kind of campaign they will run…

It’s what kind of campaign we will run.

I’ve been a politics watcher for a long time now, and frankly I’ve gotten more and more cynical with each passing election cycle. Without even realizing it, over time I came to believe that no one ever could change the tone in Washington – or would even try.

Ah, but I was so much older then, I’m younger than that now